New York agencies adjust to accommodate gay marriage
Just read an interesting piece that illustrates a key distinction between the supreme court rulings in Massachusetts and California—the ability of non-residents to swing into the state and get hitched. New York, for one, wants to be ready to extend marriage rights to gay couples, not because of any change in policy, but because of a change in California’s policy. I find this interesting in a debate surrounding who should do the deciding regarding what types of marriage is legally recognized and what it will be called—the nation, the state, or… some other state across the country. When the federal amendment was being considered, I followed church leader advice and contacted my elected representatives. The response I received made sense to me—they opposed a federal amendment because this issue, they said, should be decided by the states. Now I have to wonder; how practical a possibility is that?
